and posted in Uncategorized


Constitutional Rights Protect Sovereignty

These times are becoming much more dangerous than ever before and needs our attention before we lose everything that matters to us.

The fundamental areas being attacked are the following United States Constitution Amendments. There is not room in this report to list them all (this report will likely become an ongoing document for all of us to use in order to fight the devious schemes of the LEFT under the title of progressive doctrine.

Now is a good time to Re-introduce ourselves to these vital elements the Founding Father’s understood to be the foundation for a high functioning society.  The proof that this is true can be found in what people are doing right now, the fight to “Take Back America” to a time when the United States was not only successful, but respected.

Please familiarize yourself with these blessings that the Founding Fathers gave us and understand that protecting the Constitution is vital to our surviving the days ahead.  I fully expect to see New World Order here by this time next year if we do not or cannot change the direction we are going.

We have to become much more independent about being on government subsidies. I know it’s not going to be easy (some of us are retired and depend on Social Security. When the economy fails, which it absolutely will, we will need to be more like the America that existed during the depression.  

We CANNOT live with an entitlement attitude because it is this thinking that will accept what New World Order offers. We know that New World Order concept in practice is being rejected now by nations in the EU; which will cause major repercussions as time passes.

Peace of mind is based on trust in the integrity and functionality of our own government in protecting us from evil intentions of outside sources. Yet the true enemy appears to be coming from inside our our politicians and their greed.

The important areas that need our immediate attention are not just the election and all the rhetoric, but the undercurrent going on at the same time.  Remember how Glenn Beck used to talk about the government playing the shell game, where the focus led our minds to something else so we do not see what they are doing? This is what is going on right now.

For this reason, we need to redirect ourselves to the Constitution and the Amendments that protect us from the New World Order being fulfilled that remove us from our current way of life and enslave us to World Dogma and rule.

Since the Constitution was put into operation on March 4, 1789, thirty-three amendments to the United States Constitution have been proposed by the United States Congress and sent to the states for ratification. Twenty-seven of these, having been ratified by the requisite number of states, are part of the Constitution…google search.


Allows the right to voice an opinion (FREE SPEECH); even when it might offend someone. We also have a right to post our opinion on the internet (FREEDOM OF THE PRESS), and to LAWFULLY protest, to march and to gather in civil disobedience.

It also gives the right of religious protection from ridicule, protection from denial of God-given rights, and the ability to practice religious beliefs.

On the other hand, this amendment is hard to appreciate when Congress passes laws that require enforcing something that is in direct contradiction to religious beliefs, such as the following:

  • Forcing church owned businesses and schools to perform abortions, which they believe is against the right to life for the unborn;
  • Compelling religious owned business/schools to supply contraception and perform abortions; for example, a pharmacist who would not fill a prescription for “the day after pill” and a bakery who would not make a wedding cake with toppers of a gay couple;
  • Perhaps the long arms of political correctness will try to force the LDS church to perform same-sex marriages or to accept the alternative of not performing marriages at all.

Radical Islam is an exception to FIRST AMENDMENT protection because, based on religious beliefs and to exercise religious freedom, the government would have to accept threats of harm to the lives of others and to the sovereignty of this nation.


Gives CITIZENS the right to  Bear Arms – Liberty From America’s Founders The Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

gun_protection With the threat of terrorism and crazy people trying to commit mass murder, there is a concerted effort by government to pass restrictive gun laws.

This attempt is an affront to law-abiding citizens, who strongly believe they have a God-given right to protect their family’s and their own life, to protect what belongs to them from government and thugs (thinking they can take what’s ours), and from an overreaching government who plans to establish New World Order (which is difficult to accomplish as long as Americans own guns and will fight to prevent it). Bottom line, FREE PEOPLE OUGHT TO BE ARMED  to remain free!

Some of us believe that the Amendment’s phrase “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” creates an individual constitutional right for citizens of the United States. Of course this means, that under this “individual right theory,” the United States Constitution restricts Congress or state lawmakers from prohibiting firearm possession; or at the very least, that the Amendment prohibits restrictive regulation as unconstitutional.  

On the other hand, some scholars point to the language “a well regulated Militia” to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense.

Owning a gun does not make a person a terrorist, but it does oblige a degree of deterrence from becoming a victim. With the level of mistrust in government being sufficiently able to protect us, gun sales will go up and WOULD NOT be a good time for government to be taking away guns from law-abiding citizens; who have every intention of properly using their weapons.

It is my belief that “Free People” ought to be able to protect themselves and defend their right to live free of tyranny and abuse from their government.  In addition, if world terrorists know that Americans are armed, that they are on the alert for suspicious behavior, and that they will report an or all person(s) appearing to be suspicious, they will be more likely to attack elsewhere. But, if we appear weak and non-attentive, we leave ourselves open for an attack. AND they will pounce on weaknesses!

THE THIRD AMENDMENt to the United States Constitution

Places restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner’s consent, forbidding the practice in peacetime. See QUARTERING OF TROOPS – HERITAGE FOUNDATION

Let us hope we do not need protection from troops entering our homes (especially from the United Nations trying to confiscate our weapons).  Keep in mind though, that fine line between protecting our home and family with guns and that of being dissidents defying government (as in Martial Law).

The only way Obama or any POTUS can get away with legal gun confiscation would be civil unrest. Understand that, if you take up arms against government authorities, you may as well expect lethal retaliation without a legal defense.


Provides, “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

At times, it seems this amendment allows criminals to get away with murder (a figure of speech) and major crimes because of unnecessary restrictions put on law enforcement.  Consider living in countries that do not have this safety net to protect the innocent.  

Is it worth it?  Is it worse for an innocent person to be imprisoned than for a guilty one to escape punishment of a crime; continuing to recommit crimes because he or she is isolated from it being proven?  The answer is that there is a price for this type of freedom and will continue to be the case as long as we live in a free society!


PROVIDES that No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense again if not found guilty the first time.


Leave your Comment